A discussion recently found on the liberal blog DailyKos:
http://dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/2/24/7150/36489/402/462327
Argh! Can we please stop arguing over the WTI plant in the East End section of East Liverpool already? Yes, it deals with hazardous waste. Someone has to. Yes, its close to a school. The distance from East Elementary was legal when the original permit application process was begun back in the 1980s. Also, for what its worth, that particular school building will soon be permanently closed as part of a school realignment and reconstruction process going on in the East Liverpool City School District. Yes, there have been a few accidents at the plants over the years. What those excerpted quotes fail to point out, though, is that those accidents were generally caused by either a truck driver that failed to close a valve correctly while dropping off material, or waste that was incorrectly labeled by others, so that workers at WTI did not handle properly, believing it was something else. Yes, WTI failed some test burns before it opened. That was the whole point of testing. They found problems, corrected them, re-tested, passed, and opened. Yes, WTI has repeatedly sought to modify its permits to handle more materials; this is called doing business and trying to grow a business. A vocal minority in this community has been oppossed to WTI for 20+ years now (including some retirees of Crucible Steel in Midland, a noted “friend” of the environment), which is perfectly within their rights to be. I however grew weary of their general attitude that everyone in this town opposes this plant; we don’t.
As for the article itself, what’s the link to Hillary? Her husband’s administration granted the operating permit (it was an EPA adminstrator she helped land the job) and The Rose Law Firm represented the original founder of WTI? Yawn.